The aim of the model agreements is to maximise innovation and promote cooperation with industry and knowledge sharing. The keystone of the 7 model research cooperation agreements is that at least one commercial « partner » (called a collaborator) has the right to use the results of the project on a non-exclusive basis to promote the exploitation of the results and, therefore, innovation. Agreements must be a viable and reasonable compromise for both parties or for all parties. Model agreements are starting points and their use is not mandatory. Each type of agreement provides for different circumstances and is not sectoral, allowing for flexible use. However, the model conventions can be adapted to the specificities of your project. Consortium agreements B and C have been designed for use with Innovate UK`s collaborative R&D programme. With a few modifications, they can be adapted for other circumstances. If you would like to discuss the content of this guide in more detail or need help establishing a cooperation agreement, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org and we will contact you as soon as possible. 2. reduce the burden of time, money and work required to reach an agreement; There is no decision guide for the 4 consortium agreements. This is due to the fact that there are too many possible alternatives to multi-stakeholder research.
Grant Joint Award Agreement (Brunswick Long Form Agreement) The Grant Joint Award Agreement is used in funded cooperations that may require more complex topics, such as the creation of project management groups, the introduction and use of valuable intellectual property rights, and specific data protection or publication issues. This does not apply to all contingencies and may be changed in special circumstances. Cerys Wyn Davies, of Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law.com, said the Lambert toolkit could help « facilitate a brain encounter » between companies and universities. Companies and universities can now choose from the eleven standard contracts to negotiate the terms of their own cooperation initiatives. There are 7 presentation agreements for individual relationships and 4 consortium agreements that can be used if more than 2 parties cooperate. On the whole, these agreements have the same structure, but the main feature of the distinction is the ownership and licensing of intellectual property. These facilitate contract negotiations with publicly funded research organisations (e.g. B universities) and enterprises.
Initially launched in 2005, it consists of 5 model individual cooperation agreements and 4 multi-party consortium agreements. Each proposal contains different intellectual property provisions that allow the parties to choose those that are best suited to the type of cooperation they are developing. For example, the first of the « One-for-One » agreements provides that the institution retains the intellectual property with a non-exclusive license to the business entity; while the fourth provides that the industrial entity is the owner of the intellectual property, the entity having the right to use it only for non-commercial purposes. In order to help you choose which of the 7 model research cooperation agreements is best suited to the circumstances of your project, a decision guide guides you through some of the principles and criteria you want to take into account when deciding on ownership and rights of use of intellectual property. . . .